But you forget that he is the cleverest cat in the whole wide world. When I get home he is intent on discussing the finer points of the phenomenology of minimum bias events, while all I want to do is slump down in front of an episode of True Blood.
emily_shore wrote: "And you haven't managed to destroy the world yet!"
That's just an observer effect. We're in one of those 1-in-10^100 (and becoming steadily sparser) probability worlds where, by incredible coincidence, not one collision has produced a black hole yet.
They should build the LHC successor on the M25. If that one does produce a world-destroyer, at least we'll have the long awaited fitting conclusion to Good Omens.
That's just an observer effect. We're in one of those 1-in-10^100 (and becoming steadily sparser) probability worlds
If those were the probabilities, then we'd almost certainly be alive in a world where the black hole was crunching its way though continental Europe right now. I think we'd have noticed: www.cern.ch (and my computer jobs at CERN) are still there.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-01 01:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-01 01:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-01 01:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-01 02:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-01 03:54 pm (UTC)"Myeh?"
no subject
Date: 2010-04-02 02:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-02 03:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-01 03:23 pm (UTC)That's just an observer effect. We're in one of those 1-in-10^100 (and becoming steadily sparser) probability worlds where, by incredible coincidence, not one collision has produced a black hole yet.
They should build the LHC successor on the M25. If that one does produce a world-destroyer, at least we'll have the long awaited fitting conclusion to Good Omens.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-01 03:35 pm (UTC)If those were the probabilities, then we'd almost certainly be alive in a world where the black hole was crunching its way though continental Europe right now. I think we'd have noticed: www.cern.ch (and my computer jobs at CERN) are still there.